Which of the following was a long-term impact of the Espionage and Sedition Acts?

The Espionage and Sedition Acts, enacted during World War I, had significant implications for civil liberties in the United States. One of the long-term impacts of these acts was widespread censorship of dissent. The legislation made it a crime to criticize the government, the military, or the war effort, leading to the suppression of anti-war sentiments and the limiting of free speech.

As a result, many individuals were arrested, and various publications faced restrictions or bans. This environment of censorship instilled a climate of fear regarding expressing dissenting opinions and debates about the war and other government actions. The legacy of these acts extended beyond the war, influencing future legislation and the public perception of civil liberties, ultimately leading to ongoing discussions about the balance between national security and individual rights.

The other options do not accurately reflect the outcomes of the Espionage and Sedition Acts. Increased freedom of speech and heightened civil liberties protections were not characteristics of the period following these acts. Instead, they exemplified a repressive environment. Global movements for peace, while a response to the wartime sentiments, were not a direct impact of the acts themselves.