Which group was more likely to support a strong national infrastructure and commerce?

The Federalists were more likely to support a strong national infrastructure and commerce due to their belief in a strong central government that could promote and manage economic growth and stability. They advocated for policies that would facilitate trade, such as the establishment of a national bank and improvements in transportation systems like roads and canals. This perspective aligned with their vision of creating a robust economy that would enhance commerce and integrate the states more effectively, thus making them proponents of a federal infrastructure that could support such ambitions.

In contrast, the Anti-Federalists were concerned about the potential for a strong central government to infringe upon states' rights and liberties, leading them to support a more decentralized approach. The Democratic-Republicans, while favoring agricultural interests and states’ rights, were less focused on the expansion of a national commercial infrastructure compared to the Federalists. Libertarians generally advocate for minimal government involvement in economic matters, making them less supportive of organized national infrastructure efforts. Thus, the Federalists’ emphasis on a strong, centralized government committed to national projects and commerce distinguishes them as the group most likely to support such initiatives.