Which case determined that Georgia could not enforce its laws on lands not under its jurisdiction?

The correct case that determined Georgia could not enforce its laws on lands not under its jurisdiction is Worcester v. Georgia. In this landmark Supreme Court decision from 1832, the Court ruled that the state of Georgia had no authority to impose its laws within the territory of the Cherokee Nation.

The significance of the ruling stems from the principle that federal law and treaties with Native American tribes hold supremacy over state laws. The federal government had recognized the sovereignty of Native American tribes, and the Supreme Court, through Chief Justice John Marshall, emphasized that the federal government—not the states—had the authority to regulate relations with Native American nations. This case illustrated the limitations of state power in the face of federal protections for Native American rights and lands, establishing a precedent for the legal status of Native American tribes within the United States.

It is important to recognize that the other cases listed pertained to different legal issues. Dartmouth College v. Woodward dealt primarily with contract law and the rights of private institutions. McCullough v. Madison focused on the power of Congress and the constitutionality of a national bank. Gibbons v. Ogden revolved around the regulation of interstate commerce, showcasing the power of the federal government over states in economic matters. Each of these cases