What was the primary legal principle established by the ruling in Worcester v. Georgia?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Study for the South Carolina US History EOC Test. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions. Each question has hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam with a comprehensive understanding of South Carolina's history!

The ruling in Worcester v. Georgia established that states do not have the authority to impose their laws on lands that are under federal jurisdiction, particularly concerning Native American territory. This case underscored the principle that the federal government holds exclusive authority over Native American affairs, thus limiting the power of state governments to interfere with tribal sovereignty. The decision affirmed that the Cherokee Nation was a distinct community with the right to self-governance and made it clear that the states could not extend their laws or jurisdiction over this territory.

This legal principle reinforced the idea of tribal sovereignty and the limitations of state authority, clarifying that matters involving Native American nations fell under federal jurisdiction.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy